在线办公
期刊论坛
主 管
中国人民解放军总医院
主 办
中国人民解放军总医院老年心血管病研究所
中国科技出版传媒股份有限公司
编 辑
中华老年多器官疾病杂志编辑委员会
100853, 北京市复兴路28号
电话:010-66936756
传真:010-66936756
E-mail: zhlndqg@mode301.cn
创刊人 王士雯
总编辑 范利
副总编辑 陈韵岱
执行主编 叶大训
编辑部主任 王雪萍
ISSN 1671-5403
CN 11-4786
创刊时间 2002年
出版周期 月刊
邮发代号 82-408
友情链接
邵梦琪,杜辉,霍霞.基于CiteSpace的近10年我国老年衰弱研究文献的计量学分析[J].中华老年多器官疾病杂志,2020,19(12):925~929
基于CiteSpace的近10年我国老年衰弱研究文献的计量学分析
Bibliometric analysis of Chinese literature on senile frailty published in the last 10 years based on CiteSpace
投稿时间:2020-03-23  
DOI:10.11915/j.issn.1671-5403.2020.12.212
中文关键词:  老年人;衰弱;研究热点;CiteSpace;可视化分析
英文关键词:aged; frailty; research hotspots; CiteSpace; visualization analysis Corresponding author:DU Hui, E-mail:hdu301@126.com〖FL
基金项目:
作者单位E-mail
邵梦琪 解放军总医院第二医学中心心血管内科,北京 100853 hdu301@126.combibliometric 
杜辉 解放军总医院第二医学中心心血管内科,北京 100853 hdu301@126.combibliometric 
霍霞 解放军总医院第二医学中心心血管内科,北京 100853 hdu301@126.combibliometric 
摘要点击次数: 34
全文下载次数: 35
中文摘要:
      分析近10年我国老年衰弱领域的研究现状和研究趋势。方法 以中国知网(CNKI)为数据来源,“‘老年’OR‘老人’OR ‘高龄’AND‘衰弱’”为检索词,纳入2010至2019年期间的323篇老年衰弱相关文献。运用科学计量学工具CiteSpace及Excel 2016对发文量、作者、研究机构、发表期刊进行可视化分析,并绘制老年衰弱领域研究科学知识图谱。结果 从2017年开始,相关论文产出数量迅速增加。本研究共涉及828位作者,发文量≥10篇的作者有2位,占总人数的0.24%(2/828)。本研究共涉及211个发文机构,发文量>6篇的机构仅7所,合作主要是集中于医学院校及其附属医院之间。本研究关键词聚类分析结果显示,Q=0.6621,聚类划分显著(Q值>0.3);在同质性方面,10个聚类均高度可信(均S>0.7)。分析每一聚类所包含的关键词,归纳得出4个老年衰弱领域研究热点:老年衰弱流行病学调查、评估、认知衰弱和干预措施。结论 我国老年衰弱领域的相关研究文献数量及质量有待提高,应以聚类结果为研究热点,加强基础研究及科研合作,深化老年衰弱领域研究的横向与纵向发展,形成以老年衰弱为核心的研究力量。
英文摘要:
      Objective To analyze the current situation and research trends in the field of frailty in the elderly in China in the past 10 years. Methods The CNKI database in the period from 2010 to 2019 was searched for articles indexed about senile frailty, with “‘old’ OR ‘aged’ OR ‘senile’ AND ‘frailty’”used as search term, and there were 323 articles retrieved. The scientific metrology tools, CiteSpace and Excel 2016, were used to make visual analysis of the volume of papers, authors, research institutions, and journals, and to map scientific knowledge in the field of senile frailty in China. Results From 2017, the number of related papers was increased rapidly. A total of 828 authors were involved, and 2 of them had published ≥10 articles, accounting for 0.24%(2/828). And there were 211 research institutions involved, and only 7 of them had >6 papers. Furthermore, the cooperation was mainly between medical universities and their affiliated hospitals. The results of the Keywords clustering analysis showed that Q=0.6621, with statistically significant clustering (Q>0.3). And in homogeneity, 10 clusters were highly credible (all S>0.7). Meanwhile, we summarized 4 hotspots in the field by analyzing the Keywords in each cluster, that is, epidemiological investigation, assessment, cognition and intervention measures for senile frailty. Conclusion The quantity and quality of literature concerning senile frailty in China should be improved. The results of clustering analysis should be taken as the research hotspot, cooperation in basic and clinical research be strengthened, and horizontal and vertical development in the field be deepened in order to form a research force for senile frailty.
查看全文    下载PDF阅读器
关闭